MAY 21
Senate Backs Bill To Label Genetically
Modified Foods
HARTFORD — A bill that would require food made with
genetically modified organisms to carry labels cleared the state Senate late
Tuesday night.
The Senate's approval, on a 35-1 vote, gives new energy to
a measure that had strong grassroots backing but appeared stalled at the
Capitol this year. But its prospects in the House of Representatives are
murkier.
"I'm concerned about our state going out on its own
on this and the potential economic disadvantage that could cause,'' House
Speaker Brendan Sharkey said. "I would like to see us be part of a compact with
some other states, which would hopefully include one of the bigger states such
as New York."
Sharkey said he is taking a vote count to see if there is
sufficient backing for the bill in his chamber.
Even if the bill passes the House and is signed into law by
Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, it would not take effect until at least three other
states pass similar legislation. GMO labeling legislation is pending in more
than a dozen states.
Some food would be exempt from the labeling mandate: food
served or sold in a restaurant for immediate consumption, as well as alcoholic
beverages and farm products sold at farmer's markets, roadside stands and
pick-your-own farms.
Still, supporters hailed the bill as a victory for
consumers.
"We're not banning anything, we're not restricting
anything, we're not taxing anything," Senate Republican leader John
McKinney said at a press conference on the Capitol steps several hours before
the vote. "We're just saying let moms anddads know
what's in the food their buying for their young kids. … That's not a lot to
ask."
Genetically altered ingredients are found in many
processed foods. Through gene-splicing and other techniques, farmers have
modified crops to better resist diseases. The bioscience industry, food makers
and the federal government say such foods are safe, but activists worried about
long-term health consequences have led the push for labels.
"This is a public health issue," Senate
President Donald Williams said during the debate. "The step that we are
requesting, the mere labeling of food, is a very modest step … but it is a very
important one so consumers can take action to protect their health and the
health of their children."
The bioscience industry says GMOs are safe and vows to
fight labeling laws.
"There's a lot of emotion that's surrounding this
bill right now," said Paul Pescatello, a board member of Connecticut
United for Research Excellence, which advocates on behalf of pharmaceutical
companies, research institutions and agriculture concerns in the state.
"There's a lot of science out
there about GMO foods and GMO crops, and people should look at the science,
they should read the science, they should understand the science and then …
make a decision."
Requiring labels on GMO foods could raise constitutional
issues around free speech, Pescatello said. "There's an implication that
there's something wrong with GMO foods, that there's sort of a scarlet letter
attached to it," he said.
But proponents of the labeling law say it allows consumers
to make up their own minds. Some members of Congress are pushing for federal
legislation and in March, Whole Foods Market, the giant supermarket chain,
announced it will require all GMO foods sold in its stores to be labeled by
2018.
Source: http://articles.courant.com/2013-05-21/news/hc-gmo-labels-conn-0522-20130521_1_gmo-foods-labeling-bioscience-industry
___________________________________
Portland voters
overwhelmingly say no to fluoride
The city of Portland voters did not
approve the measure to add fluoride to the drinking water.
With 100% of the votes tallied in
Multnomah County, opponents of the plan garnered 60.69% of the vote. In
Clackamas County, the win for opponents of fluoride was narrower: 53-47.
This is the first time in more than
30 years Portland voters weighed in on the fluoride issue.
Records obtained from the Secretary
of State’s office show fluoride supporters spent $877,109 on the campaign,
while opponents spend $280,704.
39% Yeh'd.
Congratulations Portland!
Amazing news! GMO Labeling Bill Passed CT
Senate and Portland, OR says no to Fluoride!
"IF" GMOS are safe why is it such a big deal for monsanto to label. why fight it if its safe quit crying and label the foods. it must not be as safe as they say it is if they want to continue to hide it from the people. this is just my opinion. but i was always told to hold out my hands and want in one and poop in the other tell me which fills up first i weighed the odds with what little knowledge i have and i see it as this, monsanto if your foods are safe then you should not have a problem with labeling your products.
ReplyDelete" Through gene-splicing and other techniques, farmers have modified crops to better resist diseases." I call BS,,,what farmer can afford that kind of science? By farmers you mean huge
ReplyDelete"agro-corps",, such as Monsanto.
What about NJ? Is it fluorinated? I tried to find out in the official webpage but it is not updated.
ReplyDelete